Skip to main content
VS
Workflow Diagnostic · No. 01 ——— Switzerland

Stop guessing where your operations are leaking time.

Pick one workflow that feels heavier than it should. In 1–2 weeks, you get a decision document: mapped, measured in hours and francs, and ranked by what to fix first.

The expensive part is not the diagnostic. It is another quarter of the same workflow leaking time unnoticed.

Founder bottlenecks exposed
Manual re-entry made visible
Automation risk checked first
30-day fix roadmap
Where your team's 40-hour week actually goes
Asana · 10,000+ workers · 2023
Global averages shown. Your diagnostic measures your actual workflows — not these numbers.
Your business:
Sankey diagram: 40-hour work week allocation60 percent of knowledge workers' time goes to work about work rather than skilled output, per Asana's 2023 global index.40h work week · per personSkilled work · 27% · ~11h / weekStrategy & planning · 13% · ~5hWork about work · 60% · ~24h / weekbrief re-entry · client approval loops · manual reporting · tool-switching~16hreal output~24huntracked
Team size10 people
Avg. fully loaded hourly cost$80 / hr
12.0K h
hours lost per year across your team
$960K
estimated annual cost at your hourly rate
If the diagnostic doesn't surface quantified opportunities worth more than the fee — you don't pay. No vague findings. No slide decks. Either the numbers are there or the engagement is free.

Symptom matrix

If this feels normal, it is already costing you.

Most founder-led SMEs do not notice workflow friction because it looks like normal coordination. If two or more of these apply, one workflow is probably worth diagnosing before buying another tool.

  1. 01I still approve too many routine decisions
  2. 02The team asks me for context they should already have
  3. 03Client information gets copied between email, CRM, and spreadsheets
  4. 04Status updates require chasing
  5. 05We've discussed automation, but nobody knows where to start

Diagnostic rationale

The problem is rarely the tool first.

Workflow friction usually comes from a small number of structural causes. Naming them precisely is what allows the right move — whether that is a process change, a delegation rule, or, only then, automation.

Diagnose first. Automate only where it earns its place.

01

Ownership

Decisions live with the founder by default, not by design.

02

Duplication

The same client record is rewritten across email, CRM, and sheets.

03

Handoffs

Work moves between people through informal channels without context.

04

Dependency

Routine approvals queue behind the founder's calendar.

05

Premature automation

Tools are added before the workflow itself is clear.
Illustrative friction calculation

What a single noisy workflow can quietly cost.

Adjust the inputs to reflect one of your workflows. The output is an order of magnitude — useful for prioritisation, not a promise.

Manual touchpoints per item6
Minutes per touchpoint8 min
Items processed per week40
Loaded hourly cost85 CHF
Friction estimate · single workflowIllustrative
Per week
~32.0 h
2'720 CHF
Per month
~137.6 h
11'696 CHF
Inputs
  • Manual touchpoints / item6
  • Minutes per touchpoint8 min
  • Items per week40
  • Loaded hourly cost85 CHF
Illustrative calculation only — actual figures depend on workflow volume, hourly cost, and number of touchpoints.

That's an estimate from three inputs. The real number is usually worse, and it's hidden in the handoffs. Want it verified against your actual workflow?

Email me this estimate

What typically improves after a Workflow Diagnostic

From guesswork to a defined process.

Illustrative improvement areas based on typical SME workflow patterns — not a client testimonial.

Unclear ownership

Clear workflow roles

Decisions don't stall waiting for someone to claim them.

Manual chasing

Defined triggers and handoffs

Work moves on its own — nobody has to ask for status.

Founder dependency

Decision rules

Routine calls get made without the founder in the loop.

Scattered tools

Cleaner information flow

One source of truth, instead of five places to check.

Automation guesses

Prioritised automation candidates

Automation gets built where it actually pays off.

Example diagnostic output

This is the decision document you get.

A short, structured report. Built to be read by the founder in one sitting and used to make decisions in the following week.

  • Workflow map. Stages, roles, systems, decisions
  • Bottleneck analysis. Where time and clarity are lost
  • Priority matrix. Impact × effort, plotted
  • 30-day roadmap. Sequenced, owner-assigned
  • Automation readiness notes. What is safe to automate, and what is not
Automation Priority Matrix
Sample diagnostic output — automation priority matrix showing impact vs feasibility for workflow candidates

Is this for you?

Fit and not fit

This is a fit if…
  • You run a service business or small operational team
  • A specific workflow is clearly heavier than it should be
  • The founder is involved in decisions that shouldn't require them
  • Handoffs between people or tools are unclear or inconsistent
  • Automation has been discussed but the right starting point is unclear
  • You want to understand the problem before investing in solutions
This isn't a fit if…
  • You need someone to build software or deploy automation directly
  • You want a general IT or digital transformation project
  • You need immediate implementation, not a diagnostic
  • You already have a clear diagnosis and just need execution support
  • The business has fewer than 5 people and only one simple workflow
Vladyslav Shmelkov, workflow efficiency consultant

About

Vladyslav Shmelkov — based in Switzerland. Independent workflow diagnostic work, with no software commissions.

Background in Business Engineering (MSc, OST — Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences), with a focus on mathematical optimization and simulation. That's the same lens applied here: model how the work actually flows, quantify where it breaks, and rank what to fix first.

  • Independent practice
  • Based in Switzerland
  • No software commissions
  • MSc Business Engineering

Get started

Send a diagnostic request.

Tell me which workflow feels heavier than it should. I'll review the context and reply with the most relevant next step.

This goes straight to me — no sales team, no automatic proposal.

Used only to follow up on this request.

Pick the one that comes to mind first — not the whole business.

What's actually happening — delays, manual work, unclear ownership, and so on.

Helps me understand your business before we talk.